Dataflow tracking¶
Yosys can be used to answer questions such as “can this signal affect this other
signal?” via its dataflow tracking support. For this, four special cells,
$get_tag
, $set_tag
, $overwrite_tag
and $original_tag
are inserted into
the design (e.g. by a custom Yosys pass) and then the dft_tag
is run, which
converts these cells into ordinary logic. Typically, one would then use SBY
to prove assertions involving these cells.
Ordinarily in Yosys, the state of a bit is simply 0
or 1
(or one of the
special values, z
and x
). During dataflow tracking they are augmented
with a set of tags. For example, the state of a bit could be 0
and the set
of tags "KEY"
and "OVERFLOW"
.
In addition to their usual operations on the logical bits, Yosys operations must now also process the status of the tags. For this, tags are simply forwarded or propagated (i.e. copied) from inputs to outputs, according to the following general rule:
A tag is forwarded from an input to an output if the input can affect the output, for that particular state of all other inputs.
For example, XOR, AND and OR cells propagate tags as follows:
XOR simply forwards all tags from its inputs to its output, because inputs to XOR can always affect the output.
AND forwards tags on a given input only if the other input is
1
. Because if one input is0
, the other input can never affect the output.Similarly, OR forwards tags only if the other input is
0
.
There are two exceptions to this rule:
In general, propagation is only determined approximately. For example, unless the
dft_tag
code knows about a cell, it simply assumes the worst-case behaviour that all inputs can affect all outputs. Further, the code also does not consider that, when a signal affects multiple inputs of a cell, the resulting simultaneous changes of the inputs can cancel each other out, for exampleA ^ A
orA ^ (B ^ A)
is independent ofA
, but its tags would be propagated nonetheless.If tag groups are used, the rules are modified (see below).
Because of this propagation behaviour, we can answer questions about what signals are affected by a certain signal, by injecting a tag at that point in the circuit, and observing where the tag is visible.
Example use cases¶
As an example use case, consider a cryptographic processor which is not supposed
to expose its secret keys to the outside world. We can tag all key bits with the
"KEY"
tag and use SBY to formally verify that no external signal ever
carries the "KEY"
tag, meaning that key information is not visible to the
outside. As a caveat, we have to manually clear the "KEY"
tag during
cryptographic operations, as proving that the cryptographic operations
themselves do not leak key information is beyond the ability of Yosys. However
we can still easily detect, if e.g. an engineer forgot to remove debugging code
that allows reading back key data.
As a different use case, we can modify all adders in the design to set the
"OVERFLOW"
tag on their output bits, if the addition overflowed, and then
add asserts to all flip-flop inputs and output signals that they do not carry
the "OVERFLOW"
tag, i.e. that the results of overflowed additions never
affect system state. Note that in this particular example we use the ability of
tag insertion to be conditional on logic, in this case the overflow condition of
an adder.
Semantics of dataflow tracking cells¶
$set_tag
has inputs A
, SET
, CLR
, an output Y
and a string
parameter TAG
. The logic value of A
and all tags other than the one
named by the TAG
parameter are simply copied to Y
. If SET
is 1
,
then the named tag is added to Y
. Otherwise, if CLR
is 1
, then the
named tag is removed. Otherwise, the tag is unchanged, i.e. it is present in
Y
if it is present in A
.
$get_tag
has an input A
and an output Y
and a string parameter
TAG
. $get_tag
inspects A
for the presence or absence of a tag of the
given name and sets Y
to 1
if the tag is present. The logical value of
A
is completely ignored.
$overwrite_tag
functions like $set_tag
, but lacks the Y
output.
Instead of providing a modified version of the input signal, it modifies the
signal A
“in-place”, i.e. if a signal is input to $overwrite_tag
, that
is equivalent to interposing a $set_tag
between its driver and all cells it
is connected to. The main purpose of $overwrite_tag
is adding tags to
signals produced within a module that cannot or should not be modified itself.
$original_tag
functions identically to $get_tag
, but ignores
$overwrite_tag
, i.e. when converting the $overwrite_tag
to $set_tag
as described above, it is equivalent to inserting the $get_tag
before the
$set_tag
.
Tag groups¶
Tag groups are an advanced feature that modify the propagation rule discussed
above. To use tag groups, simply name tags according to the schema
"group:name"
. For example, "key:0"
, "key:a"
, "key:b"
would be
three tags in the "key"
group.
The propagation rule is then amended by
Inputs cannot block the propagation of each other’s tags for tags of the same group.
For example, an AND gate will propagate a given tag on one input, if the other
input is either 1 or carries a tag of the same group. So if one input is 0,
"key:a"
and the other is 0, "key:b"
the result would be 0, "key:a",
"key:b"
, rather than simply 0
. Note that if we add an unrelated
"overflow"
tag to the first input, it would still not be propagated.